A C R Report for the Year ( )
			Printed Date:

1 PART-I : PERSONAL DATA

2 PART-II : SELF APPRAISAL

2.1 Brief description of duties :

2.2 Quantitative Targets / Objectives & Achievements :

Please specify the quantitative targets/objectives set for yourself or that were set for you and your achievements againist each target.

2.2.1 Training Programmes / Events :

SNo.	Training Progammes / Events	Targeted	Achieved

2.2.2 Research Taken up :

SNo.	Research	Planned	Completed

2.2.3 Research Papers Published :

SNo.	Research Papers Published	Planned	Completed

2.2.4 Policy Advocacy :

SNo.	Policy Advocacy	Planned	Completed

2.2.5 Working Papers Authored :

SNo.	Working Papers	Planned	Completed

2.2.6 Books / Chapters Authored :

SNo.	Books / Chapters	Planned	Completed

2.2.7 Presented/Attended - Seminars, Conferences, Workshops :

SNo.	Sessions	Planned	Completed

2.2.8 Reviews / Abstraction :

SNo.	Reviews/Abstraction	Planned	Completed

2.2.9 Guidance :

SNo.	Guidance	Planned	Completed

2.2.10 Specialization Attained :

SNo.	Specialization	Planned	Completed

2.2.11 Any Others :

SNo.	Item Name	Planned	Completed

2.3 Details of Training, Research, Publications/Authoring, Seminars/Workshops/Conferences,Guidance and Specialization

2.3.1 Details of Trainings:

2.3.1.1 Details of Training Programmes / Courses

2.3.1.1A Details of the training programmes

2.3.1.1B Details of the PG Programme/Course

2.3.1.2 Details of Workshops / Seminars

2.3.1.2A Details of the Workshops

2.3.1.2B Details of the Seminars

2.3.1.3 Details of New Training Programmes/Courses Designed

2.3.1.4 Details of Course Material/Modules Prepared/ Improved

2.3.2. Details of Research

2.3.2A Details of NIRDPR Research

2.3.2B Details of Consultancy Research

2.3.2C Details of Action Research

2.3.3 Details of Publications / Authoring ( Articles / Research Papers / Chapters / Books )

2.3.3.1 Research Papers / Articles

2.3.3.2 Details of Books

2.3.3.3 Chapters in Books

2.3.3.4 Policy Advocacy :

SNo.	Title	Brief Description

2.3.4 Details of Reviews / Abstracting

2.3.4.1 Journal / Book Review

2.3.4.2 Journal / Book Abstracting

2.3.5 Details - Attended / Presented

Details of National / International Seminars / Workshops / Conferences / Trainings Attended / Presented

2.3.6 Guidance

Details of Students guidance as Internship / Ph.D

2.3.7 New Area of Specialization

New area of specialisation attained, if any, developed during the year under report (Through certification / Online Programmes)

2.4 General :

2.4.1 Extra-curricular Activities :

2.4.2 Members in Important Committees / Tasks forces :

List of important comittees / task forces within and outside organization worked, if any :

2.4.3 Any other achievements :

Any other achievement deserving special mention relating to quality in research, training, publications etc:

2.5 Significant achievements inlcuding innovation:

2.6 Constraints:

2.7 Area of Interest

Area of Interest in which you would like to develop

Assessment of the A C R Report for the Year ( )
Name of the Officer (ACR Report)		:
Name of the Reporting Authority		:
Name of the Reviewing Authority		:
Name of the Accepting Authority		:

Part-III : Assessment of the Reporting Officer

3.1 Nature and Quality of Work

3.2 Grading (8-10:Out Standing, 6-8:Very Good, 4-6:Good, 2-4:Average, 0-2:Below Average )

3.2.1 Assessment of Work Output ( Weightage to this section would be 40% for Heads/Deans]; 40% for Other Faculty)

Numerical Grading to be awarded by Reporting and Reviewing Authority on a scale of 1 to 10 where 1 is lowest

3.2.2 Assessment of Functional Competency ( Weightage to this section would be 30% for Heads/Deans; 30% for Other Faculty)

3.2.3 Assessment of Personal Attributes ( Weightage to this section would be 15% for Heads/Deans; 30% for Other Faculty)

3.2.4 Assessment of Special Attributes of Heads/Deans ( Weightage to this section would be 15%)

3.3 General

3.3.1 State of Health

3.3.2 Integrity

3.3.3 General Assessment (Overall Assessment)

3.4 Grading ( Derived from the above data )

Total Derived Values from the above data	:
Final Result	:
Note : (0-2:Below Average, 2-4:Average, 4-6:Good, 6-8:Very Good, 8-10:Out Standing)

Out Standing (5)	Very Good (4)	Good (3)	Average (2)	Below Average (1)

Assessment of the A C R Report for the Year ( )
Name of the Officer (ACR Report)		:
Name of the Reporting Authority		:
Name of the Reviewing Authority		:
Name of the Accepting Authority		:

Part-IV : Assessment of the Reviewing Aurthority

4.1 Length of Service under the Reviewing Officer

4.2 Is the Reviewing Officer Satisfied with assessment of Reporting Officer :

Reasons:

4.3 Pen Picture

Pen Picture covering special / exceptional abilities and recommendations for higher position / special assignament. If so specify

Reasons:

4.4 Grading (8-10:Out Standing, 6-8:Very Good, 4-6:Good, 2-4:Average, 0-2:Below Average )

4.4.1 Assessment of Work Output ( Weightage to this section would be 40% for Heads/Deans; 40% for Other Faculty)

Numerical Grading to be awarded by Reporting and Reviewing Authority on a scale of 1 to 10 where 1 is lowest

4.4.2 Assessment of Functional Competency ( Weightage to this section would be 30% for Heads/Deans; 30% for Other Faculty)

4.4.3 Assessment of Personal Attributes ( Weightage to this section would be 15% for Heads/Deans; 30% for Other Faculty)

4.4.4 Assessment of Special Attributes of Heads/Deans ( Weightage to this section would be 15%)

5. Grading ( Derived from the above data )

Total Derived Values from the above data	:
Final Result	:
Note : (0-2:Below Average, 2-4:Average, 4-6:Good, 6-8:Very Good, 8-10:Out Standing)

Out Standing (5)	Very Good (4)	Good (3)	Average (2)	Below Average (1)

Assessment of the A C R Report for the Year ( )
Name of the Officer (ACR Report)		:
Name of the Reporting Authority		:
Name of the Reviewing Authority		:
Name of the Accepting Authority		:

Part-V : Assessment of the Accepting Authority

5.1 Length of Service under the Accepting Officer

5.2 Is the Accepting Officer Satisfied with assessment of Reviewing Officer :

5.3 Pen Picture

Pen Picture covering special / exceptional abilities and recommendations for higher position / special assignament. If so specify

5.4 Grading (5-Out Standing, 4-Very Good, 3-Good, 2-Average, 1-Below Average )

Final Grading :

Out Standing (5)	Very Good (4)	Good (3)	Average (2)	Below Average (1)